![]() |
|||||
|
Background on "Disarming Attacks" against Police Officers We need to be careful about jumping to conclusions and laying blame about the incident in the Atlanta, Georgia courthouse. We need to pass disarming legislation. We need to educate America - and politicians in particular -- about the risk and dangers faced daily by Americas brave men and women in blue -- there are approximately 60,000 assaults on law enforcement annually. LEAAs disarming legislation was introduced in GA in 1996. OUR BEST RESEARCH SUGGESTS THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN PASSED. We need bad guys to know that they face increased penalties! Recognize that every attack on an officer involves at least one gun in some way. This attack is part of an increasingly visible issue: violence in -- and around -- courthouses Depending on the year, as many as 10-20% of the officers killed in the line of duty are killed by bad guys who take the officers gun and use it against them. Bad guys routinely practice dis-arming techniques in while serving time in prison -- often while they are bulking up with prison weight lifting equipment. We allow this to continue in jails and prisons across America. We need to empower officers to use whatever force necessary, to include deadly force, to repel and resist violent attacks.(particularly since a violent physical attacks is a necessary precursor to disarming an officer.) In most local courthouses in America the Sheriffs department provides the security. These deputies are called Balliffs; they are usually the only armed law enforcement inside the courthouse. In many -- if not most courthouses -- police officers arriving in the courthouse must disarm and lock up thier guns. Usually, Police Officers are usually NOT allowed to carry inside the courthouse. As a result of the apparent increase in violence in and around courthouses, some states are moving to allow more people to carry guns for self-defense at the courthouse. LEAA supports efforts to allow the good guys to carry guns so that they have a fighting chance. Sadly, in many courthouses in America there is an irrational stigma about moving criminal defendants in cuffs/restraints. Criminal defendents awaiting trial have thier cuff/restraints removed BEFORE they enter the courtroom because defense lawyers claim that by being cuffed, their clients wont be treated fairly. Sadly, even after conviction, when convicts return for sentencing, appeals, etc., they are brought into the courtroom without restraints. Had the alleged rapist in Georgia been kept in even the most modest of restraints, the heinous crime attributed to him that resulted in the death of a judge, a court reporter and a police officer could not have taken place. Only rarely, and then only with the worst, most violent criminals, will a judge allow restraints to be kept on the criminal in the courtroom. As a society, we need to recognize that there are dangerous, violent people in this world and many of them come through the doors of the courthouse.
Steps we can take to help solve this problem:
LEAA has been a leader in the fight to protect law enforcement from disarming attacks! |
|||||
|
Read LEAA's |
|||||